Colored Speech: Cross Burnings, Epistemics, and the Triumph of the Crits?

59 Pages Posted: 5 Nov 2003

Date Written: October 20, 2003

Abstract

This Essay examines the Court's recent decision in Virginia v. Black. It argues that Black signifies a different approach to the constitutionality of statutes regulating cross burnings. It shows how the Court's conservatives have essentially accepted the intellectual framework and the mode of analysis suggested previously by the critical race theorists. In particular, this Essay explores the role that Justice Thomas plays in the case. The Essay explains Justice Thomas's active participation as a matter of epistemic authority and epistemic deference.

Keywords: Justice Thomas, cross burning, RAV, Virginia v. Black, epistemic authority, deference, critical race theory

Suggested Citation

Charles, Guy-Uriel, Colored Speech: Cross Burnings, Epistemics, and the Triumph of the Crits? (October 20, 2003). Minnesota Public Law Research Paper No. 03-18. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=463280 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.463280

Guy-Uriel Charles (Contact Author)

Duke University School of Law ( email )

Box 90360
Science Drive & Towerview Rd.
Durham, NC 27708
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
133
rank
209,413
Abstract Views
2,169
PlumX Metrics