Stranded Assets and Compensation in Upstream Projects: Conceptual and Practical Issues

9 Pages Posted: 16 Nov 2023

See all articles by Julia Paletta Crespo

Julia Paletta Crespo

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Bruno Cunha

Centre for Energy and Environmental Economics (Cenergia)

Rebecca Draeger

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) - Centre for Energy and Environmental Economics (Cenergia)

Roberto Schaeffer

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) - Centre for Energy and Environmental Economics (Cenergia)

Alexandre Szklo

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) - Centre for Energy and Environmental Economics (Cenergia)

Abstract

In the context of strict remaining carbon budgets and the consequent need to raise the ambition to phase down oil and gas production through the reduction or even cessation of exploration and production (E&P) projects, this perspective discusses the definition of stranded assets and its misleading interpretations regarding asset compensation. The compensation here pertains to a situation in which oil and gas upstream activities (exploration, development, or extraction) are stopped without pre-existing provisions for that in contracts. Speculatively speaking and considering an accurate concept of stranded assets, this halt is justified due to the imperative to decarbonize the economy. Compensation methodologies based on valuation approaches and applied to upstream operators (owners of E&P rights) are presented and discussed: (i) market-based, (ii) income-based and (iii) asset-based. While the market-based approach presents challenges to compensating E&P assets due to the difficulty to find benchmark projects and transactions that allow the definition of the “fair market value”, the income-based approach (using the discounted cash flow technique) is more suitable for compensating assets in the production phase because they have proven performance track record. In the case of assets in the exploration and development phases, the asset-based approach would be better applied since its valuation is grounded on the investor expenses and there are no metrics to ensure the performance at these stages of the project.

Keywords: oil and gas, upstream, stranded assets, compensation, valuation, climate change.

Suggested Citation

Crespo, Julia Paletta and Cunha, Bruno and Draeger, Rebecca and Schaeffer, Roberto and Szklo, Alexandre, Stranded Assets and Compensation in Upstream Projects: Conceptual and Practical Issues. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4635208 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4635208

Julia Paletta Crespo (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Bruno Cunha

Centre for Energy and Environmental Economics (Cenergia) ( email )

Av; Pasteur, 250
terreo - Bairro Maracana
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 23890000
Brazil

Rebecca Draeger

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) - Centre for Energy and Environmental Economics (Cenergia) ( email )

Largo de São Francisco
1, Centro
Rio de Janeiro, 22270000
Brazil

Roberto Schaeffer

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) - Centre for Energy and Environmental Economics (Cenergia) ( email )

Brazil

Alexandre Szklo

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) - Centre for Energy and Environmental Economics (Cenergia) ( email )

Largo de São Francisco
1, Centro
Rio de Janeiro, 22270000
Brazil

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
177
PlumX Metrics