Consequences of Bank Stress Test Disclosures

57 Pages Posted: 3 Dec 2023

See all articles by Brent Schmidt

Brent Schmidt

Pennsylvania State University - Department of Accounting

Date Written: August 28, 2024

Abstract

Whether bank stress test results should be disclosed has been debated since the 2008 financial crisis. Utilizing two novel settings, I examine the effects of these disclosures on risk taking and financial stability. I show that, during a normal economic period, rather than having a disciplining effect, disclosure leads to banks increasing risk taking, consistent with banks facing pressure to offset the costs of stress testing. Despite critics concerns, I find no evidence that disclosure affects financial stability during a normal period. In contrast, during a crisis period, stress test disclosures appear to discipline risk taking for banks performing worse on the stress test. However, systemic risk for these banks also increases, highlighting concerns that disclosure can undermine stability. These results inform the debate regarding whether stress test results should be disclosed and the broader debate regarding the effects of transparency on financial stability.

Keywords: Banks, Stress Test Disclosure, Risk Taking, Financial Stability, Bank Opacity

Suggested Citation

Schmidt, Brent, Consequences of Bank Stress Test Disclosures (August 28, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4649867 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4649867

Brent Schmidt (Contact Author)

Pennsylvania State University - Department of Accounting ( email )

University Park, PA 16802-3306
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
98
Abstract Views
357
Rank
516,383
PlumX Metrics