Under the Radar? Discretionary Impairments of Definite and Indefinite Intangible Assets

59 Pages Posted: 11 Dec 2023 Last revised: 28 Feb 2024

See all articles by Gopal V. Krishnan

Gopal V. Krishnan

Bentley University

Alexander Liss

KU Leuven, Department Accounting, Finance and Insurance; TRR 266 Accounting for Transparency

Ulf Mohrmann

NHH Norwegian School of Economics - Department of Accounting, Auditing and Law

Jan Riepe

University of Tuebingen - Department of Banking

Date Written: February 19, 2024

Abstract

We examine (a) how reporting incentives and business indicators impact impairment differently for definite and indefinite intangible assets, (b) the moderating role of internal and external monitoring on impairment recognition, and (c) how the coverage of impairment of intangibles varies in media and by analysts based on the type of intangible asset. Our findings reveal disparities in impairment indicators across different types of intangibles and a significant impact of reporting incentives on the impairment decision, particularly for acquired intangibles. These findings highlight the necessity of separately analyzing the impairment of definite and indefinite intangibles and goodwill. Second, internal monitoring strongly moderates the likelihood of impairments for indefinite intangibles and goodwill for firms that face high impairment pressure, indicating the role of strong corporate governance in enhancing the reporting quality of intangibles. Third, we find that even sophisticated external monitors, i.e., the media and analysts during conference calls, do not pay sufficient attention to the impairment decisions of definite and indefinite intangibles, allowing firms to exploit the discretion in intangible impairment that remains under the radar. Overall, our study contributes to the scarce literature on indicators of impairment of non-goodwill intangibles by providing empirical evidence that impairment indicators differ between definite and indefinite intangibles and how media coverage and analyst’s questions on conference calls differ for impairments of definite and indefinite intangibles and goodwill. Given the growing importance of intangibles, our findings are relevant to accounting regulators, analysts, auditors, and investors in assessing the risk of impairment of intangibles.

Keywords: Intangibles, goodwill, impairment, negative sentiment, financial reporting

Suggested Citation

Krishnan, Gopal and Liss, Alexander and Mohrmann, Ulf and Riepe, Jan, Under the Radar? Discretionary Impairments of Definite and Indefinite Intangible Assets (February 19, 2024). TRR 266 Accounting for Transparency Working Paper Series No. 137, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4660302 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4660302

Gopal Krishnan (Contact Author)

Bentley University ( email )

175 Forest Street
Waltham, MA 02452
United States
781-891-2477 (Phone)

Alexander Liss

KU Leuven, Department Accounting, Finance and Insurance ( email )

Naamsestraat 69
Leuven, B-3000
Belgium

TRR 266 Accounting for Transparency ( email )

Warburger Straße 100
Paderborn, 33098
Germany

Ulf Mohrmann

NHH Norwegian School of Economics - Department of Accounting, Auditing and Law ( email )

Helleveien 30
N-5045 Bergen
Norway

Jan Riepe

University of Tuebingen - Department of Banking ( email )

Nauklerstr. 47
72074 Tuebingen, Baden Wuerttemberg 72074
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
191
Abstract Views
627
Rank
336,237
PlumX Metrics