The Role of Direct Democracy in the European Union
31 Pages Posted: 12 Nov 2003
Date Written: November 2003
Abstract
In this paper, the introduction of direct-democratic decision-making in all EU decisions is considered when it is feasible without prohibitively increasing decision-making costs. We start with the contractarian argument that each constitution is a contract joining the citizens of a state and requires as such the explicit agreement of (a majority of) citizens. Thus, the future European Constitution as well as future changes of it should be decided by the European citizens. After a discussion of the pros and cons of direct democracy, the ability of direct democracy to help creating a European demos is discussed. Consequently, we propose a mandatory (required and binding) referendum on total and partial revisions of the European Constitution. In addition, we propose a constitutional initiative, a statutory and a general initiative as well as a fiscal referendum for financially important projects.
Keywords: direct democracy, referenda, initiatives
JEL Classification: D78
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
On Government Centralization and Budget Referendums: Evidence from Switzerland
-
By Matthias Benz and Alois Stutzer
-
The Impact of Voter Initiatives on Economic Activity
By Akila Weerapana, S. Brock Blomberg, ...
-
Direct Democracy: Designing a Living Constitution
By Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer
-
Who Controls? Information and the Structure of Legislative Decision Making
By Arthur Lupia and Mathew D. Mccubbins
-
The Economic Effects of Direct Democracy - A First Global Assessment
By Lorenz Blume, Jens Müller, ...
-
Making International Organizations More Democratic
By Alois Stutzer and Bruno S. Frey
-
The Economic Effects of Direct Democracy - a Cross-Country Assessment
By Stefan Voigt and Lorenz Blume