Imposing the Risk-Based Capital Ratio Alongside the Leverage Ratio to Credit Unions: Go or No-Go?

66 Pages Posted: 18 Jan 2024

See all articles by Gino Biaou

Gino Biaou

Laval University, Faculté d'Administration, Département de Finance et Assurance, Students; École Nationale d'Administration Publique (ENAP)

Hélyoth Hessou

Université de Sherbrooke; Université de Sherbrooke

Van Son Lai

Université Laval

Date Written: December 22, 2023

Abstract

The credit union (CU) amendments to the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) include bank-like risk-based capital rule (RBC) imposed alongside the leverage ratio (LR). This new RBC implemented since 2022 targets credit unions (CUs) with assets above $500 million. The reform draws heavy criticisms on the basis that it is inappropriate for the CU mutualist model that differs from the profit-oriented bank businesses. Using semiannual panel data from National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Call reports from 1994 to 2015, we ask which one, the RBC or LR, or both, works well to enhance CUs’ solvency and to predict their failures. We find that the regulatory accounting measures for asset risk used in the RBC computations are compatible with the CU financial performance and risk measures. Both capital metrics (RBC and LR) exhibit power in predicting CU solvency and stability proxied by the Z-score. Only the LR matters in the determination of CU failure and the RBC predicts well the failure of lowly capitalized CUs. We underscore the imposition of the RBC alongside the LR only to large CUs. Larger CUs have less capital than do small CUs, and more importantly, these large CUs are effectively constrained by the RBC rather than by the LR.

Keywords: Credit unions, risk-based capital ratio, leverage ratio, Z-score, asset quality and risk, financial performance, failure

JEL Classification: G23

Suggested Citation

Biaou, Gino and Hessou, Hélyoth and Hessou, Hélyoth and Lai, Van Son, Imposing the Risk-Based Capital Ratio Alongside the Leverage Ratio to Credit Unions: Go or No-Go? (December 22, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4683333 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4683333

Gino Biaou

Laval University, Faculté d'Administration, Département de Finance et Assurance, Students ( email )

Pavillon Palasis-Prince
Quebec, Quebec G1K 7P4
Canada

École Nationale d'Administration Publique (ENAP) ( email )

4750 avenue Henri-Julien
Montreal, Quebec H2T 3A5
Canada

Hélyoth Hessou

Université de Sherbrooke ( email )

Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1
Canada
J1K 2R1 (Fax)

Université de Sherbrooke ( email )

2500, boulevard de l'Université, Ecole
de gestion, Campus principal (Pav K1)
Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1
Canada
J1K 2R1 (Fax)

Van Son Lai (Contact Author)

Université Laval ( email )

FSA ULaval
Quebec G1V 0A6
Canada
418-656-2131, x3943 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
Abstract Views
216
Rank
724,569
PlumX Metrics