Debt Tokens

56 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2024 Last revised: 20 Feb 2024

See all articles by Diane Lourdes Dick

Diane Lourdes Dick

The University of Iowa College of Law

Christopher K. Odinet

Texas A&M University School of Law

Andrea Tosato

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law

Date Written: January 14, 2024

Abstract

The worlds of crypto and bankruptcy have collided. Once-prominent, fast-growing, and even politically influential platforms for trading cryptocurrencies have imploded spectacularly. Gone are the glossy advertisements, celebrity endorsements, and proclamations that blockchain operates as a law unto itself. Instead, insolvent crypto businesses-including the crypto exchange giant FTX-find themselves in bankruptcy court, no different from any other failed enterprise. These bankruptcies reveal a startling reality: individual investors who placed their trust in these platforms have been stripped of their digital assets. In their stead, they hold hardto-collect claims against these defunct platforms. Amidst the chill of the crypto winter, bankruptcy has unexpectedly emerged as a crucible for innovation, forging a new digital asset: debt tokens. Entrepreneurs have responded to the tidal wave of trade debts arising from the insolvencies of crypto platforms by embarking on a mission to create blockchain-based digital assets that represent bankruptcy claims. They present debt tokens as cutting-edge devices for swiftly and advantageously liquidating these distressed assets. Yet, the pressing question is this: are these debt tokens actually useful innovations or yet another hollow promise? This Article offers the first comprehensive analysis of debt tokens, making three seminal contributions. First, we scrutinize existing debt token offerings, laying bare their inherent flaws and casting doubt on their legitimacy. Second, we explore the potential for genuine debt tokens within the framework of the recently adopted 2022 amendments to the Uniform Commercial Code. Lastly, we delve into the broader socioeconomic implications of widespread debt token adoption. Specifically, we anticipate debt tokens fostering more effective collective action and improved exit opportunities, particularly for those creditors who traditionally fare the worst in bankruptcy due to having fewer resources and pressing financial needs. However, we also caution against the looming risks of irrational speculation and the exploitation of inexperienced retail investors blinded by the bright lights of innovation.

Keywords: crypto, blockchain, tokens, FTX, Celsius, Voyager, BlockFi, bankruptcy, insolvency, digital asset, UCC, Uniform Commercial Code, Article 12, CER, controllable electronic record, controllable account, controllable payment intangible, debt, credit, creditor, debtor, Chapter 11, trading

Suggested Citation

Dick, Diane Lourdes and Odinet, Christopher K. and Tosato, Andrea, Debt Tokens (January 14, 2024). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Forthcoming, U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2024-02, SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 660, Texas A&M University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 24-73, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4694629 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4694629

Diane Lourdes Dick

The University of Iowa College of Law ( email )

Melrose and Byington
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States
52242 (Fax)

Christopher K. Odinet (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University School of Law ( email )

1515 Commerce St.
Fort Worth, TX Tarrant County 76102
United States

Andrea Tosato

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.smu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/tosato-andrea

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
3,613
Abstract Views
16,872
Rank
6,804
PlumX Metrics