Hit-and-Run or Hit-and-Stay? Unintended Effects of a Stricter Bac Limit

41 Pages Posted: 5 Feb 2024 Last revised: 7 May 2025

See all articles by Michael T. French

Michael T. French

University of Miami - Health Management and Policy

Gulcin Gumus

Florida Atlantic University

Abstract

Although they comprise a relatively small subset of all traffic deaths, hit-and-run fatalities are both contemptible and preventable. We analyze longitudinal data from 1982-2008 to examine the effects of blood alcohol concentration (BAC) laws on hit-and-run traffic fatalities. Our results suggest that lower BAC limits may have an unintended consequence of increasing hit-and-run fatalities, while a similar effect is absent for non-hit-and-run fatalities. Specifically, we find that adoption of a .08 BAC limit is associated with an 8.3% increase in hit-and-run fatalities. This unintended effect is more pronounced in urban areas and during weekends, which are typical settings for hit-and-run incidents.

Keywords: BAC, hit-and-run, traffic fatalities, DUI, FARS

JEL Classification: H73, I12, I18

Suggested Citation

French, Michael T. and Gumus, Gulcin, Hit-and-Run or Hit-and-Stay? Unintended Effects of a Stricter Bac Limit. IZA Discussion Paper No. 16774, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4714268

Michael T. French (Contact Author)

University of Miami - Health Management and Policy ( email )

United States
305-284-6039 (Phone)

Gulcin Gumus

Florida Atlantic University

Boca Raton, FL 33431
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
23
Abstract Views
354
PlumX Metrics