Distortionary Taxes and the Provision of Public Goods
19 Pages Posted: 21 Aug 2007 Last revised: 1 Aug 2022
Date Written: November 1990
Abstract
When comparing marginal costs and benefits of a public project, most economists think in terms of adding together the marginal costs of production plus marginal costs of additional distortionary taxation. This paper clarifies how the "revenue effect" offsets the "distortionary effect." For Cobb-Douglas utility with a marginal increase in a proportional wage tax, they exactly offset each other and the Samuelson rule is unaffected. Also, with a preexisting wage tax, an incremental lump-sum tax has only this "revenue effect:" it increases labor supply, increases tax revenue from the preexisting wage tax, and thus makes the project easier to fund. In our numerical example, the incremental lump-sum tax costs taxpayers only $.77 per dollar raised.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Louis Kaplow
-
By Louis Kaplow
-
Pareto Efficient and Optimal Taxation and the New New Welfare Economics
-
The Desirability of Commodity Taxation Under Non-Linear Income Taxation and Heterogeneous Tastes
-
The Theory of Taxation and Public Economics
By Louis Kaplow
-
The Impact of the Estate Tax on the Wealth Accumulation and Avoidance Behavior of Donors
By Joel B. Slemrod and Wojciech Kopczuk
-
On the Undesirability of Commodity Taxation Even When Income Taxation is Not Optimal
By Louis Kaplow
-
On the Undesirability of Commodity Taxation Even When Income Taxation is Not Optimal
By Louis Kaplow
-
Estate and Gift Taxes and Incentives for Inter Vivos Giving in the United States