Assessing Verbal Eyewitness Confidence Statements Using Natural Language Processing

33 Pages Posted: 9 Feb 2024

See all articles by Rachel Leigh Greenspan

Rachel Leigh Greenspan

University of Mississippi - Criminal Justice and Legal Studies

Alex Lyman

Brigham Young University

Paul S. Heaton

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School

Date Written: February 5, 2024

Abstract

After an eyewitness completes a lineup, officers are advised to ask witnesses how confident they are in their identification. While researchers in the lab typically study eyewitness confidence numerically, confidence in the field is primarily gathered verbally. In the current study, we used a natural language processing approach to develop an automated model to classify verbal eyewitness confidence statements. Across a variety of stimulus materials and witnessing conditions, our model correctly classified adult witnesses’ (N = 4,541) level of confidence (i.e., high, medium, or low) 71% of the time. Confidence-accuracy calibration curves demonstrate that the model’s confidence classification performs similarly in predicting eyewitness accuracy compared to witnesses’ self-reported numeric confidence. Our model also furnishes a new metric, confidence entropy, that measures the vagueness of witnesses’ confidence statements and provides independent information about eyewitness accuracy. These results have implications for how empirical scientists collect confidence data and how police interpret eyewitness confidence statements.

Keywords: eyewitness confidence, verbal confidence, natural language processing, eyewitness accuracy, eyewitness misidentifications, police officers, machine learning approaches, Transformer-based Large Language Mode

Suggested Citation

Greenspan, Rachel Leigh and Lyman, Alex and Heaton, Paul S., Assessing Verbal Eyewitness Confidence Statements Using Natural Language Processing (February 5, 2024). U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 24-06, Psychological Science, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4720985

Rachel Leigh Greenspan

University of Mississippi - Criminal Justice and Legal Studies ( email )

United States

Alex Lyman

Brigham Young University ( email )

Provo, UT 84602
United States

Paul S. Heaton (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.law.upenn.edu/cf/faculty/pheaton/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
181
Abstract Views
1,678
Rank
332,707
PlumX Metrics