The Stakes of the Supreme Court’s Pro-Corruption Rulings in the Age of Trump: Why the Supreme Court Should Have Taken Judicial Notice of the Post-January 6 Reality in Percoco

Yale Law Journal Forum, Forthcoming

35 Pages Posted: 12 Mar 2024

Date Written: February 14, 2024

Abstract

In Percoco, the Supreme Court squandered opportunities to contextualize political corruption. This piece argues that the Supreme Court should have taken judicial notice of the Post-January 6th circumstances which surround the decision. This is a perilous time in American democracy for the Justices to make prosecuting corrupt campaign managers arduous.

Keywords: Percoco, Ciminelli, Honest Services Fraud, Bribery, Supreme Court, corruption, political corruption, campaign manangers, Donald Trump, January 6, judicial notice, election law, anti-corruption, prosecution, Skilling, McDonnell, Kelly, U.S. v. Percoco, Toni Morrison

Suggested Citation

Torres-Spelliscy, Ciara, The Stakes of the Supreme Court’s Pro-Corruption Rulings in the Age of Trump: Why the Supreme Court Should Have Taken Judicial Notice of the Post-January 6 Reality in Percoco (February 14, 2024). Yale Law Journal Forum, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4726757 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4726757

Ciara Torres-Spelliscy (Contact Author)

Stetson University College of Law ( email )

1401 61st Street South
Gulfport, FL 33707
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
67
Abstract Views
356
Rank
720,434
PlumX Metrics