Did Shelby County v. Holder Increase the Racial Turnout Gap?

60 Pages Posted: 18 Mar 2024 Last revised: 5 Mar 2025

See all articles by Kevin Morris

Kevin Morris

New York University (NYU) - Brennan Center for Justice

Michael Miller

Barnard College, Columbia University

Date Written: February 23, 2024

Abstract

Between 1965 and 2013, many states and localities with histories of racial discrimination in their voting practices were required to pre-clear any changes to their electoral policies with the federal government to ensure they would not have racially discriminatory effects. In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated Section 4b of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) in Shelby County v. Holder, effectively nullifying this "preclearance condition" in the VRA. We begin by examining the policies submitted for (and those blocked by) preclearance during the half-century in which it was operative, showing that preclearance largely prevented discriminatory local policies from going into effect. We then leverage nearly a billion individual-level vote records to show that Shelby County increased the racial turnout gap. We find that these effects were concentrated in counties where policies had been blocked by preclearance, and where specifically local policies were constrained by the VRA

Keywords: Voter Turnout, Supreme Court, Voting Rights

Suggested Citation

Morris, Kevin and Miller, Michael, Did Shelby County v. Holder Increase the Racial Turnout Gap? (February 23, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4736882 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4736882

Kevin Morris (Contact Author)

New York University (NYU) - Brennan Center for Justice ( email )

120 Broadway
Ste 1750
New York, NY 11213
United States

Michael Miller

Barnard College, Columbia University ( email )

3009 Broadway
New York, NY 10027
United States
607-342-8348 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
383
Abstract Views
1,553
Rank
163,351
PlumX Metrics