Do Tax-Exempt Bonds Really Subsidize Municipal Capital?
17 Pages Posted: 6 Jan 2007 Last revised: 13 Feb 2023
Date Written: September 1991
Abstract
We argue that the tax-exempt status of municipal bonds provides little or no subsidy to capital investment by communities. Instead, the tax exemption simply provides arbitrage opportunities to high and low tax bracket individuals while leaving individuals in intermediate tax brackets essentially unaffected. We also argue that the revenue cost of the tax exemption is much less than traditionally thought due to the portfolio rebalancing that would occur if the tax exemption were eliminated. Finally, we note that the only way to prevent all municipal arbitrage possibilities would be to pass through municipal interest income and payments to residents for tax purposes.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
A General Equilibrium Simulation Study of Subsidies to Municipal Expenditures
By Roger H. Gordon and Joel B. Slemrod
-
An Empirical Examination of Municipal Financial Policy
By Roger H. Gordon and Joel B. Slemrod
-
How Prevalent is Tax Arbitrage? Evidence from the Market for Municipal Bonds
By Merle Erickson, Austan Goolsbee, ...
-
How Prevalent is Tax Arbitrage? Evidence from the Market for Municipal Bonds
By Merle Erickson, Austan Goolsbee, ...
-
The Role of Federal Taxation in the Supply of Municipal Bonds: Evidence from Municipal Governments
-
The Supply Elasticity of Tax-Exempt Bonds
By David Joulfaian and Thornton Matheson