Getting Merger Guidelines Right

38 Pages Posted: 28 Feb 2024

See all articles by Keith N. Hylton

Keith N. Hylton

Boston University - School of Law

Date Written: February 27, 2024

Abstract

This paper is on the new Merger Guidelines. It makes several arguments. First, that the Guidelines should be understood as existing in a political equilibrium. Second, that the new structural presumption of the Merger Guidelines (HHI = 1,800) is too strict, and that an economically reasonable revision in the structural presumption would have increased rather than decreased the threshold. Whereas the new Guidelines lowers the threshold to HHI 1,800 from HHI 2,500, an economically reasonable revision would have increased the threshold to HHI 3,200. I justify this argument using a bare-bones model of Cournot competition. Third, it seems unlikely, as an empirical matter, that merger enforcement under the existing Guidelines is socially desirable. Fourth, that federal merger enforcement raises serious constitutional issues, originally discussed in 1904, and that it may be time now, in view of the new Guidelines, to return to these foundational constitutional questions.

Keywords: antiturst, merger law, merger guidelines, structural presumption, Clayton Act constitutionality

JEL Classification: K21, K23, L22

Suggested Citation

Hylton, Keith N., Getting Merger Guidelines Right (February 27, 2024). Boston Univ. School of Law Research Paper No. 24-3, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4741089 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4741089

Keith N. Hylton (Contact Author)

Boston University - School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-8959 (Phone)
617-353-3077 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
199
Rank
680,076
PlumX Metrics