When Exchanges Are Not Exchanges: Evidence From Two Types of Dark Trading

47 Pages Posted: 13 Apr 2024 Last revised: 5 Mar 2025

See all articles by Yunus Topbas

Yunus Topbas

Peking University HSBC Business School

Mao Ye

Cornell University; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Cornell SC Johnson College of Business

Date Written: March 14, 2024

Abstract

ATSs (Alternative Trading Systems) and non-ATSs are collectively referred to as "dark trading" and often studied as a unified entity. However, they markedly differ in their legal and economic attributes. Unlike ATSs, non-ATSs are not legally classified as "exchanges" and typically execute trades as principals. This structure grants non-ATSs greater flexibility and stronger incentives to exclude informed orders compared to ATSs. Consequently, we find that shocks increasing market transparency raise transaction costs on ATSs but reduce them on non-ATSs. Our results also help reconcile the ongoing debate on identifying retail trades. Boehmer et al. (2021) analyze data before our transparency shocks, while their critics use data afterward.

Keywords: Transparency, Dark Trading, ATSs (Alternative Trading Systems), Non-ATSs, Market Quality, Retail Trading

Suggested Citation

Topbas, Yunus and Ye, Mao, When Exchanges Are Not Exchanges: Evidence From Two Types of Dark Trading (March 14, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4759130 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4759130

Yunus Topbas (Contact Author)

Peking University HSBC Business School ( email )

Mao Ye

Cornell University ( email )

349 Sage Hall
114 E Ave
ITHACA, NY 148536201
United States
6072559509 (Phone)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Cornell SC Johnson College of Business ( email )

Ithaca, NY 14850
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
282
Abstract Views
1,219
Rank
230,081
PlumX Metrics