Factual Predictability in Competition Law Enforcement: Rules versus Standards

Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2024-10

Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance Research Paper No. 2024-05

Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2024-05

17 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 2024

See all articles by Jan Broulík

Jan Broulík

Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance

Date Written: March 26, 2024

Abstract

This paper discusses the predictability of competition law enforcement and in particular of fact determination. It relies on the traditional jurisprudential distinction between rules and standards and focuses on the deterrent function of competition law. The paper shows that the application of rules makes fact-determination more predictable than the application of standards. At the same time, however, standards fare better than rules in terms of enforcement accuracy. As both predictability and accuracy are necessary to deter harmful conduct without deterring the benign one, this objective will hence be maximized by a legal test that generates the appropriate combination of predictability and accuracy.

Keywords: competition law, antitrust, enforcement, fact finding, predictability, legal certainty, error, rules, standards

JEL Classification: K21, K40

Suggested Citation

Broulík, Jan, Factual Predictability in Competition Law Enforcement: Rules versus Standards (March 26, 2024). Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2024-10, Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance Research Paper No. 2024-05, Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2024-05, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4773206 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4773206

Jan Broulík (Contact Author)

Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance ( email )

P.O.Box 1030
Amsterdam, 1000 BA
Netherlands

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
120
Abstract Views
346
Rank
451,137
PlumX Metrics