Potential, Prizes and Performance: Testing Tournament Theory with Professional Tennis Data
32 Pages Posted: 15 Dec 2003 Last revised: 10 May 2025
Abstract
This paper tests two hypotheses from the theory of elimination tournaments: (i) that uneventournaments, where the contestants are ex ante heterogeneous, entail lower effort exertion;this is a prediction from agency theory that has not been tested empirically before; and (ii)whether incentives set through prizes matter for effort exertion; this assumption underlies anyagency theory about elimination tournaments, and has been empirically tested in othercontexts. The evidence obtained with data from professional tennis tournaments supportsboth the assumption that incentives matter, as well as the theoretical implications concerninguneven tournaments among heterogeneous contestants.
Keywords: incentives in tournaments, tennis, uneven tournaments, elimination tournaments
JEL Classification: J41, J33, M12
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Piece Rate vs. Time Rate: The Effect of Incentives on Earnings
By Eric Seiler
-
An Economic Evaluation of the Moneyball Hypothesis
By Jahn Karl Hakes and Raymond D. Sauer
-
Contests, Grand Prizes, and the Hot Hand
By Todd Mcfall, Charles R. Knoeber, ...
-
Incentives Versus Sorting in Tournaments: Evidence from a Field Experiment
By Edwin Leuven, Hessel Oosterbeek, ...
-
Incentives Versus Sorting in Tournaments: Evidence from a Field Experiment
By Edwin Leuven, Hessel Oosterbeek, ...
-
Team Performance, Efficiency and Wage Distribution in Professional Baseball