Asset Allocation Advice: Reconciling Expected Utility with Shortfall Risk
40 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2004
Date Written: December 2003
Abstract
Researchers studying the asset allocation problem for long-term investors have employed different investor criterion functions. Some analyses have been based on maximization of expected utility. The most commonly used utilities are quadratic utility, which yields the ubiquitous mean-variance utility function underlying modern portfolio theory, and constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) power utility. Both utilities require an assumed value or measurement of a utility risk aversion parameter appropriate to a particular investor. But there are no scientifically validated procedures for accurately assessing an individual's risk aversion parameter, and some have suggested that all such procedures are doomed to failure.
Other analyses have been based on minimizing the probability of falling short of a particular investor's long-term goals or investable benchmark he/she would like to beat. The target shortfall probability approach may be easier to motivate and explain to investors, and obviates the need to assess a risk aversion parameter. But early criticisms from expected utility advocates cast doubt on the prescriptive usefulness of other criteria that depend on shortfall probabilities.
I argue that conventional CRRA utility and shortfall probability analyses can be reconciled by simply eliminating the conventional assumption that the utility's risk aversion parameter is not ALSO determined by maximization of expected utility. The simplest asset allocation problem is used to illustrate this result. The results are quite sensible, and lead to a re-examination of expected utility advocates' arguments for the conventional use of expected utility and against the minimization of target shortfall probability. Neither the former nor the latter are as important as expected utility advocates believe.
Keywords: Portfolio choice, shortfall risk, large deviations
JEL Classification: G11, D81, C44
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Asset Allocation in a Value-at-Risk Framework
By Ronald Huisman, Kees C. G. Koedijk, ...
-
Measuring the Performance of Ethical Mutual Funds: A DEA Approach
By Antonella Basso and Stefania Funari
-
Hedging and Value at Risk: A Semi-Parametric Approach
By Zhiguang Cao, Richard D. F. Harris, ...
-
By Fei Chen and Charles Sutcliffe
-
Comparison of Historical and Parametric Value-at-Risk Methodologies
-
Asset Allocation and Long-Term Returns: An Empirical Approach
By Stephen Coggeshall and Guowei Wu
-
Dynamic Hedging Strategies: An Application to the Crude Oil Market
By Delphine Lautier and Alain G. Galli
-
Dynamic Hedging Strategies: An Application to the Crude Oil Market
By Delphine Lautier and Alain G. Galli