Does the Sequence of Seasoned Equity Offerings Matter?
28 Pages Posted: 6 Jan 2005
Abstract
We investigate the relation between announcement period returns and the sequence of seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) for industrial, financial, and utility firms making multiple offerings. For industrial firms, there is a monotonically positive relation between the returns and the sequence of issues. Further, the stock price reactions to the fourth and subsequent issues by industrial firms are insignificant. For firms that conduct at least two SEOs, there is no difference in returns between industrial firms and utilities or financial institutions. The lower negative returns for later announcements by industrial firms can be explained by reduced adverse selection costs.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Insider Trading and the Long-Run Performance of New Security Issues
-
Long-Run Performance and Insider Trading in Completed and Canceled Seasoned Equity Offerings
By Kathleen M. Kahle, Craig G. Dunbar, ...
-
Managerial Opportunism? Evidence from Directors' and Officers' Insurance Purchases
By John Chalmers, Larry Dann, ...
-
By Hong Zou, Wong Sonia, ...
-
Examining Bank SEOs: Are Offers Made by Undercapitalized Banks Different?
By O. Emre Ergungor, C. N. V. Krishnan, ...
-
The Long-Run Performance of Firms that Withdraw Seasoned Equity Offerings
-
Commercial Real Estate Overbuilding in the 1980's: Beyond the Hog Cycle
-
The Information Content of Insider Call Options Trading
By Robert Chen and Xinlei Shelly Zhao
-
Mutual Funds’ Holdings and Listed Firms’ Dividend Payouts in China
By Jingjing Yang, Jing Chi, ...