The Lost History of "History and Tradition"

61 Pages Posted: 7 May 2024 Last revised: 4 Nov 2024

See all articles by Dov Fox

Dov Fox

University of San Diego: School of Law

Mary Ziegler

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Date Written: May 5, 2024

Abstract

The Supreme Court has decided one blockbuster after another by appeal to “history and tradition,” deploying that standard to remake key features of the constitutional landscape: from overturning Roe to abolishing affirmative action, from narrowing the scope of public accommodations to widening the margin for church/state entanglements. The Court says that its history-and-tradition test emerged fully formed in 1997 from an assisted-suicide case that was designed to rein in the drift toward living constitutionalism under the Warren and Burger Courts. This origin story is compelling. The problem is it isn’t true—not where the test came from or even what it is. That narrative erases decades of social movement conflict that this Article is the first to excavate. It marshals original archives to reveal that the history-and-tradition test was fashioned from the crucible of earlier struggles: over the value of deep and more recent history, over which communities and what kind of evidence define tradition, and, ultimately, over the role of America’s past in our constitutional present.

The contours of this debate have been sharpened across doctrines and eras, inside the courts and beyond them. Recovering this history uncovers a rival vision of the history-and-tradition test—not entrenched but evolving. Taking seriously this dynamic alternative makes three contributions. First, it casts doubt on major decisions about race, abortion, guns, and God, while challenging the fixed-in-time conception of traditionalism these rulings stand on. Second, the more adaptive version of history and tradition sheds light on puzzles including the levels-of-generality problem, the constitutional progressive response to charges of judicial activism, and how a modern conservative legal coalition was forged out of fierce divisions over originalist methods and outcomes. Finally, that lost method bears surprising implications for claims that span the ideological spectrum: from fetal rights and gay marriage to gender-affirming care and conversion therapy. For instance, entrenched history and tradition probably wouldn’t operate to protect widely accepted rights such as interracial marriage and medical refusal. Whereas evolving traditionalism could protect yet-unrecognized rights that it wouldn’t protect right now, looking ahead to a sustained future that made a custom of aid in dying or assisted reproduction.

Keywords: traditionalism, originalism, levels of generality, social movement politics, Federalist Society, Alliance Defending Freedom, abortion, fetal rights, gun control, religious liberty, medical refusal, aid in dying, assisted reproduction, gender-affirming care

Suggested Citation

Fox, Dov and Ziegler, Mary, The Lost History of "History and Tradition" (May 5, 2024). San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 24-015, Southern California Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 1 (2024), Forthcoming , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4817793 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4817793

Dov Fox (Contact Author)

University of San Diego: School of Law ( email )

5998 Alcalá Park
San Diego, CA 92110
United States
(619) 260-4600 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: https://www.sandiego.edu/law/about/directory/biography.php?profile_id=3332

Mary Ziegler

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
351
Abstract Views
1,010
Rank
171,280
PlumX Metrics