Judicial Humility and Reticence in Administrative Law

10 Pages Posted: 9 May 2024

See all articles by Jack Fitzhenry

Jack Fitzhenry

The Heritage Foundation

GianCarlo Canaparo

The Heritage Foundation

Date Written: May 7, 2024

Abstract

Certain quarters of the bar and the bench praise courts’ deference to agencies as a sign of judicial humility and restraint. Those plaudits, however, proceed from misconceptions about agencies’ ability to communicate technical subject matter to non-expert judges and judges’ ability to apprehend the technical details relevant to resolving legal disputes. That overly dim view of agency communication and judicial comprehension has led deference’s proponents to offer an unnecessary reconceptualization of the judicial role at odds with the third branch’s historic underpinnings. This essay reexamines the expertise and accountability justifications for judicial deference in light of recent scholarship.

Keywords: administrative law; judicial deference

undefined

Suggested Citation

Fitzhenry, Jack and Canaparo, GianCarlo, Judicial Humility and Reticence in Administrative Law (May 7, 2024). Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 23, 2024, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4820354

Jack Fitzhenry (Contact Author)

The Heritage Foundation

GianCarlo Canaparo

The Heritage Foundation

214 Massachusetts Ave NE
Washington, DC 20002-4999
United States

0 References

    0 Citations

      Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

      Paper statistics

      Downloads
      57
      Abstract Views
      225
      Rank
      785,890
      PlumX Metrics