Kristelia García’s Response to Question for the Record, House Subcommittee on the Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, Committee on the Judiciary, Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: Part III – IP Protection for AI-Assisted Inventions and Creative Works

3 Pages Posted: 10 Jun 2024

Date Written: May 1, 2024

Abstract

You asked me the following: “Has the development of generative AI, and works created with generative AI, had any impact on the value of human-created works, or is it too soon to know? If it is too soon to know, what do you expect to happen based on the info available now? You encouraged Congress to exercise restraint with respect to legislation. What developments in case law or potential agency regulation should Congress look at to glean insight into potential legislation?”

Keywords: copyright, artificial intelligence, Congress, regulation

Suggested Citation

García, Kristelia, Kristelia García’s Response to Question for the Record, House Subcommittee on the Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, Committee on the Judiciary, Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: Part III – IP Protection for AI-Assisted Inventions and Creative Works (May 1, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4821645 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4821645

Kristelia García (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
14
Abstract Views
76
PlumX Metrics