Defending Aggregated Legislative Intent

forthcoming in the Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence

31 Pages Posted: 31 May 2024

See all articles by David Tan

David Tan

Deakin University, Geelong, Australia - Deakin Law School

Date Written: May 30, 2024

Abstract

Theories of aggregated legislative intent posit that the legislative intent of parliament is what some - significant enough - proportion of legislators intended (e.g. legislative intent is p if a majority intend that p). After all many think the same way about democracy – votes reveal the will of the people – and courts – there is a court decision based on judicial voting. The existing literature on aggregated legislative intent, however, tends to make two undefended assumptions: (i) Informed Assumption: all legislators have policy intentions and (ii) Group Intent Assumption: that the existence of an aggregated intent entails the existence of a group intent. Despite these assumptions being subject to great scrutiny, they largely remain undefended. This paper defends the Group Intent Assumption and shows that aggregated theories can survive with a weaker version of the Informed Assumption.

Keywords: Legislative Intent, Aggregation, Intentionalism, Parliamentary Intent

Suggested Citation

Tan, David, Defending Aggregated Legislative Intent (May 30, 2024). forthcoming in the Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4849524 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4849524

David Tan (Contact Author)

Deakin University, Geelong, Australia - Deakin Law School ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
53
Abstract Views
233
Rank
813,617
PlumX Metrics