Election Exceptionalism in Justiciability and Related Doctrines: Constitutional Compensation in Light of Purcell

44 Pages Posted: 16 Jul 2024

See all articles by Vikram D. Amar

Vikram D. Amar

University of California, Davis - School of Law; University of Illinois College of Law

Date Written: November 01, 2023

Abstract

Pursuant to the so-called Purcell doctrine, lower federal courts (and perhaps the U.S. Supreme Court itself) are supposed to refrain from issuing remedies that would alter the rules for election administration in the runup to Election Day.  Whatever may be invoked to explain or support the instincts behind the Purcell rule (e.g., concerns about voter confusion, candidate and campaign expectations, smooth operation of election logistics, etc.), one tremendously problematic entailment of Purcell is that elections are held (and candidates are elected and policies are determined) under (often substantial) legal clouds.  Even if those clouds can be removed for future election cycles (an outcome itself not always easy under current justiciability rules), the fact remains that, because of Purcell, binding elections (with momentous consequences) take place even when serious doubt exists about the legality of the contests under federal statutes and the Constitution.  Because of these deleterious consequences (and even assuming the Purcell doctrine makes some sense or in any event is entrenched at the Court), I seek, making use of “compensation” theory, to identify ways that justiciability doctrines (e.g., mootness, first- and third-party standing, ripeness, vagueness and overbreadth) and related constraints on access to federal fora can and should be overtly modified to offset Purcell’s undesirable effects, and facilitate earlier and easier federal adjudication and remediation in election-related challenges.  It turns out the foundations of such an election exceptionalism as regards access to federal courts has been partially (if inconsistently and haphazardly) laid by the Supreme Court, but the Court has never meaningfully tried to tie the various foundation beams together in a structurally sound and coherent way, much less describe and explain what the doctrinal edifice should look like and why. That is what I seek to do in this Article. 

Suggested Citation

Amar, Vikram D., Election Exceptionalism in Justiciability and Related Doctrines: Constitutional Compensation in Light of Purcell (November 01, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4860257 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4860257

Vikram D. Amar (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201
United States

University of Illinois College of Law

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
59
Abstract Views
510
Rank
782,530
PlumX Metrics