Twelve principles for transformation-focused evaluation

62 Pages Posted: 26 Jun 2024 Last revised: 6 Mar 2025

See all articles by Sam Buckton

Sam Buckton

University of York - Department of Environment and Geography

Ioan Fazey

University of York - Department of Environment and Geography

Peter Ball

University of York

Zenda Ofir

affiliation not provided to SSRN

John Colvin

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Matthew Darby

University of York

Adam Hejnowicz

University of Edinburgh

Graham Leicester

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Rebecca Newman

University of York - Department of Environment and Geography

Glenn Page

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Kelly Parsons

University of Cambridge

Barbara van Mierlo

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: March 06, 2025

Abstract

There are growing calls for societies to transform towards regenerative futures that support the flourishing of life and transcend interlinked social and ecological crises. Many actors are now trying to identify whether desired transformations are occurring, and how different interventions are contributing to transformation. These are questions of evaluation. However, we lack a holistic appreciation of how evaluation can most effectively assist transformation efforts. Here, we undertake a systematized scoping review of a  large body of evaluation literature to identify principles and methodologies for transformation-focused evaluation. We identify twelve distinct but interdependent principles which, when applied by evaluators (and supported by evaluation commissioners and funders), are considered to significantly enhance the effectiveness of evaluation in assessing and assisting transformations, although tensions exist between some of the principles. The principles were clustered into three overarching themes of Complexity Principles (how evaluation approaches complex systems), Power Principles (evaluators’ power relations), and Purpose Principles (evaluation’s deeper purpose and values). The Complexity Principles call on evaluators to: 1) treat evaluands as nested systems with complex interactions; 2) recognize that evaluands are unique and need context-adapted evaluation; 3) use mixed methods to understand contributions to change under conditions of uncertainty and imperfect information; 4) use more agile and developmental approaches; and 5) use foresight alongside retrospective evidence. The Power Principles ask evaluators to: 6) promote justice in power relations, rights, and use of knowledge; 7) shift power towards evaluation users and blur the evaluator-evaluand dichotomy; 8) support autonomous evaluation practice; and 9) cultivate mutualistic partnerships of knowledge and action. Finally, the Purpose Principles encourage evaluators to: 10) surface, question and uphold values; 11) foster evaluation cultures centered around ongoing learning; and 12) focus on evaluating and supporting systemic transformations towards regenerative futures. Relevant methodologies are suggested for operationalizing the principles. Transformation-focused evaluation is a radical shift from conventional practice but the urgency to address global crises makes the shift a crucial one.

Suggested Citation

Buckton, Sam and Fazey, Ioan and Ball, Peter and Ofir, Zenda and Colvin, John and Darby, Matthew and Hejnowicz, Adam and Leicester, Graham and Newman, Rebecca and Page, Glenn and Parsons, Kelly and van Mierlo, Barbara, Twelve principles for transformation-focused evaluation (March 06, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4872604 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4872604

Sam Buckton (Contact Author)

University of York - Department of Environment and Geography ( email )

290 Wentworth Way
Heslington, YO10 5NG
United Kingdom

Ioan Fazey

University of York - Department of Environment and Geography

290 Wentworth Way
Heslington, YO10 5NG
United Kingdom

Peter Ball

University of York ( email )

Heslington
University of York
York, YO10 5DD
United Kingdom

Zenda Ofir

affiliation not provided to SSRN

John Colvin

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Matthew Darby

University of York ( email )

Adam Hejnowicz

University of Edinburgh ( email )

Graham Leicester

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Rebecca Newman

University of York - Department of Environment and Geography

290 Wentworth Way
Heslington, YO10 5NG
United Kingdom

Glenn Page

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Kelly Parsons

University of Cambridge ( email )

Trinity Ln
Cambridge, CB2 1TN
United Kingdom

Barbara Van Mierlo

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
182
Abstract Views
904
Rank
353,012
PlumX Metrics