Retention or Regressivity? The Empirical Effects of 401(k) Vesting Schedules

76 Pages Posted: 28 Jun 2024 Last revised: 16 Jan 2025

Date Written: June 25, 2024

Abstract

Vesting requirements are a common yet understudied feature of defined-contribution retirement plans. Using administrative recordkeeping data, we find that 30% of separations occur during participants' vesting periods. The resulting forfeitures of employer contributions are concentrated among lower-income participants and make the distribution of 401(k) compensation significantly more regressive. Firms do not enjoy offsetting efficiency benefits: employing both cross-plan and within-plan identification strategies, we find no evidence that vesting exerts a causal retention effect. A linked survey shows informational frictions to be a key mechanism, as a majority of respondents do not know their current plan's vesting rules.

Keywords: 401(k) plans, vesting, retirement

JEL Classification: D1, G50, G51, J26, J32, J63, M52

Suggested Citation

Carranza, Guillermo and Goodman, Aaron, Retention or Regressivity? The Empirical Effects of 401(k) Vesting Schedules (June 25, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4876231 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4876231

Guillermo Carranza

Yale University ( email )

493 College St
New Haven, CT CT 06520
United States

Aaron Goodman (Contact Author)

The Vanguard Group, Inc. ( email )

100 Vanguard Blvd
Malvern, PA 19355
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
221
Abstract Views
1,164
Rank
280,692
PlumX Metrics