The Impact of Family Control of Firms on Leverage: Australian Evidence
33 Pages Posted: 28 May 2004
Date Written: January 15, 2004
Abstract
This paper investigates whether leverage of family controlled firms differs from that of non-family controlled firms. Using data from publicly listed industrial firms in Australia traded over 1998 to 2002, family controlled firms appear to have higher levels of leverage than non-family counterparts. Results indicate that the families' incentive to use debt as a means of concentrating voting power outweighs the need to reduce debt in order to mitigate firm risk. Additional analyses show that the desire to use debt as a means for concentrating control is stronger for both smaller family firms and family firms operating in the mining sector. These results add new findings to the leverage literature.
Keywords: family firms, leverage, private benefits of control
JEL Classification: G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Founding Family Ownership and the Agency Cost of Debt
By Ronald C. Anderson, Sattar Mansi, ...
-
Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market
By Sattar Mansi, William F. Maxwell, ...
-
What is Different About Family Businesses?
By Ralph Chami
-
By David M. Reeb, Sattar Mansi, ...
-
Ownership Concentration, Monitoring, and the Agency Cost of Debt
By Holger M. Mueller and Roman Inderst
-
Evidence that Differences in Bankruptcy Law Among Countries Affect Equity Returns
-
Corporate International Activity and Debt Financing
By Sattar Mansi and David M. Reeb
-
Return Differences between Family and Non-Family Firms: Absolute and Index Differences
By Carol Padgett and Suranjita Mukherjee
-
Risks of International Activities and Corporate Financing - A Review and Suggestions