Soil Organic Carbon to Clay Ratio in Different Pedoclimatic and Agronomic Conditions in Northeastern North America: A New Approach Proposed

21 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2024

See all articles by Inderjot Chahal

Inderjot Chahal

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Joseph Amsili

Cornell University

Daniel Saurette

University of Guelph

Jennifer A. Bower

University of Vermont

Adam Gillespie

University of Guelph

Harold M. van Es

Government of Canada - Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Laura L. Van Eerd

Government of Canada - Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

Soil organic C levels are strongly influenced by pedoclimatic and agronomic environments; hence, establishing universal threshold values for SOC to differentiate soils into healthy and degraded classes is nearly impossible. Previously, SOC:clay ratio thresholds were used to classify soils into categories of “degraded”, “moderate”, “good”, and “very good”. In this study, we assessed the applicability of the SOC:clay ratio as an indicator of soil carbon health on 2249 soil samples collected from Ontario (Canada) and New York (USA). Our results confirmed that the classification of soil based on SOC:clay ratio was highly clay biased, inaccurate, and not a true representation of soil degradation status. Fine-textured soils had a high percentage of degraded soils (73%) whereas coarse textured soils had a large percentage (62%) of soils with “very good” soil carbon health. Therefore, we do not recommend using SOC:clay ratio as a metric to assess soil carbon health or degradation status. Alternatively, we tested a ratio between actual and expected SOC levels as an indicator of soil degradation. Our results confirmed that classification of soil based on the SOC:SOCexp ratio was unbiased and independent of clay content, and a positive relationship was observed between the SOC:SOCexp ratio and the soil health indicators. Furthermore, we found that SOC:SOCexp better differentiated between soil degradation classes for all the tested soil health indicators than SOC:clay. While SOC:SOCexp was found to be a better predictor of soil functionality than SOC:clay, the SOC:SOCexp thresholds were based on our dataset (a small population) and would not be appropriate across pedo-climatic zones. Overall, we conclude that SOC:clay is not an effective indicator of soil carbon health status and SOC:SOCexp might be more useful to derive baseline levels and monitor the temporal dynamics at a regional scale.

Keywords: Clay content, Production system, Soil Health, Soil organic C, soil texture

Suggested Citation

Chahal, Inderjot and Amsili, Joseph and Saurette, Daniel and Bower, Jennifer A. and Gillespie, Adam and van Es, Harold M. and Van Eerd, Laura L., Soil Organic Carbon to Clay Ratio in Different Pedoclimatic and Agronomic Conditions in Northeastern North America: A New Approach Proposed. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4881508 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4881508

Inderjot Chahal (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Joseph Amsili

Cornell University ( email )

Ithaca, NY 14853
United States

Daniel Saurette

University of Guelph ( email )

Guelph
Canada

Jennifer A. Bower

University of Vermont ( email )

212 Kalkin Hall
Burlington, VT 05405-0158
United States

Adam Gillespie

University of Guelph ( email )

Harold M. Van Es

Government of Canada - Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada ( email )

Performance and Analysis Directorate
Policy Branch
Ottawa, K1V 0C6
Canada

Laura L. Van Eerd

Government of Canada - Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada ( email )

Performance and Analysis Directorate
Policy Branch
Ottawa, K1V 0C6
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
30
Abstract Views
137
PlumX Metrics