Schufa’s Case C-634/21 on ADM: the ‘Lenders’ Quest’ for GDPR-friendly Scoring has not been settled yet! 

11 Pages Posted: 2 Jul 2024

See all articles by Francisco Andrade

Francisco Andrade

University of Minho - School of Law; University of Minho - Algoritmi Research Centre

Diogo Morgado Rebelo

E-Tec – State, Enterprise and Technology

Date Written: July 02, 2024

Abstract

In the ever-changing landscape of data protection and Automated Decision-Making (ADM), a notable dispute has arisen between Land Hessen, the Federal State of Hesse’s Data Protection and Freedom of Information Commissioner (HBDI), and OQ, a consumer who was refused a loan based on SCHUFA’s predictive score. The case, C-634/21, delves into the heart of Article 22 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) , questioning whether SCHUFA’s use of probability scores qualifies as a ‘weapon’ of math destruction, raising concerns about legal gaps in data subject protection. This blog entry discusses some key issues, legal complexities, and the recent CJEU ruling on December 7, 2023, which sheds no light on the impact of AMD practices on transparency rights

Suggested Citation

Andrade, Francisco and Morgado Rebelo, Diogo, Schufa’s Case C-634/21 on ADM: the ‘Lenders’ Quest’ for GDPR-friendly Scoring has not been settled yet!  (July 02, 2024). JusGov Research Paper No. 2024-03, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4882806 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4882806

Francisco Andrade (Contact Author)

University of Minho - School of Law

University of Minho - Algoritmi Research Centre

Diogo Morgado Rebelo

E-Tec – State, Enterprise and Technology ( email )

Escola de Direito
Campus de Gualtar
Braga, 4710-057
Portugal

HOME PAGE: http://www.jusgov.uminho.pt/pt-pt/investigadores/diogo-morgado-rebelo/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
134
Abstract Views
434
Rank
457,290
PlumX Metrics