How Innovation-Friendly is the EU Novel Food Regulation? The Case of Cellular Agriculture

29 Pages Posted: 12 Jul 2024

See all articles by Tilman Reinhardt

Tilman Reinhardt

University of Bayreuth

Alessandro Monaco

University of Bayreuth

Abstract

We systematically analyze how the EU’s Novel Food Regulation affects food innovation in the European Union (EU) with a specific focus on cellular agriculture. We employ an original analytical framework based on innovation systems theory and triangulate legal analysis with stakeholder perceptions collected through EFSA’s stakeholder consultations, expert interviews and an original stakeholder survey. Our results show that several aspects of the regulation impede entrepreneurial experimentation, resource mobilization and market formation. The robust safety assessment by EFSA in principle contributes to the legitimation of the technology but does not address key sustainability concerns. This creates potential for “legal disruption” in the broader context of the food system transformation. We argue that relatively minor changes to the Novel Food Regulation could increase its innovativeness without compromising food safety or compliance with EU primary and WTO law. Experimental regulation in the form of “regulatory sandboxes” could help to identify more innovation-friendly solutions and address sustainability concerns regarding cellular agriculture.

Keywords: cultivated meat, novel food regulation, innovation systems, Sustainability, legal disruption

Suggested Citation

Reinhardt, Tilman and Monaco, Alessandro, How Innovation-Friendly is the EU Novel Food Regulation? The Case of Cellular Agriculture. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4892706 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4892706

Tilman Reinhardt

University of Bayreuth ( email )

Universitatsstr 30
Bayreuth, D-95447
Germany

Alessandro Monaco (Contact Author)

University of Bayreuth ( email )

Universitatsstr 30
Bayreuth, D-95447
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
102
PlumX Metrics