Pitt v HMRC: follower notices, precedent and the “reasonable person”

British Tax Review, Issue 3, 2024

11 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2024

Date Written: July 15, 2024

Abstract

HMRC may issue a follower notice where they consider that an earlier judicial ruling is “relevant”, meaning that it would deny a tax advantage asserted by a taxpayer. The taxpayer may then be penalised for continuing to assert the advantage.

Follower notices were considered by the Supreme Court in R. (on the application of Haworth) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners. The court held that, to issue a follower notice, HMRC must form the opinion that there is no scope for a reasonable person to disagree that the earlier ruling denies the asserted advantage.

In Pitt v Revenue and Customs Commissioners, HMRC had issued a follower notice, relying on Audley v Revenue and Customs Commissioners as the earlier ruling. The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) had dismissed the resulting appeals. On appeal to the Upper Tribunal (UT), the taxpayer argued that the FTT erred in comparing the “reconstituted” facts (meaning the evaluative conclusions and inferences drawn from the facts) of Audley with those of his case, and ought to have compared only the “primary” facts (meaning the facts from which the conclusions and inferences were drawn).

It is unsurprising that the UT dismissed the appeal. But the FTT and UT decisions are instructive. They suggest a difference in approach between the assessment of whether a judicial ruling is “relevant” for the purposes of the follower notice regime and the orthodox assessment of a ruling’s precedential value. The UT also considered the use by the Supreme Court in Haworth of the phrase “reasonable person”, providing welcome, albeit abbreviated, analysis.

This material was first published by Thomson Reuters, trading as Sweet & Maxwell, 5 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5AQ, in the British Tax Review as “Pitt v HMRC: follower notices, precedent and the ‘reasonable person’” [2024] B.T.R. (3) 382-391 and is reproduced by agreement with the publishers.

Keywords: Tax, Precedent, Follower notices, Anti-avoidance, Income tax, Loan notes, Penalties, Reasonableness, Relevance

Suggested Citation

Mehta, Harmish, Pitt v HMRC: follower notices, precedent and the “reasonable person” (July 15, 2024). British Tax Review, Issue 3, 2024, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4896430 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4896430

Harmish Mehta (Contact Author)

Radcliffe Chambers ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
10
Abstract Views
65
PlumX Metrics