Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Story of Brown v. City of Oneonta: The Uncertain Meaning of Racially Discriminatory Policing under the Equal Protection Clause

21 Pages Posted: 28 Jan 2004  

R. Richard Banks

Stanford Law School

Date Written: January 2004

Abstract

This article discusses the widely publicized case Brown v City of Oneonta, in which police officers attempted to apprehend a rape suspect described only as a young, black man by stopping and questioning every young black man in the area. The Second Circuit dismissed the equal protection claims filed by those innocent young men who were stopped and questioned. The Oneonta case raises genuinely difficult constitutional questions, and thereby illuminates the character of current equal protection doctrine.

Suggested Citation

Banks, R. Richard, The Story of Brown v. City of Oneonta: The Uncertain Meaning of Racially Discriminatory Policing under the Equal Protection Clause (January 2004). Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 81. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=490842 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.490842

R. Richard Banks (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
650-723-6591 (Phone)
650-725-4607 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
513
Rank
44,086
Abstract Views
5,481