Public-Private Partnerships After Murthy v. Missouri

27 Pages Posted: 1 Aug 2024

See all articles by Danielle Keats Citron

Danielle Keats Citron

University of Virginia School of Law

Jeffrey Stautberg

University of Virginia (UVA) School of Law

Date Written: July 31, 2024

Abstract

This essay considers the future of public-private collaboration in the wake of the Murthy v. Missouri litigation, which cast doubt on the constitutionality of information sharing between federal agencies and social media companies. The litigation has been a good and a bad teacher. On one hand, the lower court decisions made legible the risks to free expression, accountability, transparency, and intimate privacy posed by government-industry collaborations. On the other hand, the litigation chilled information sharing between federal agencies, state election officials, and social media companies at the very moment that such collaboration could help protect against foreign malign influence operations designed to undermine the integrity of the 2024 elections. We must rebuild the public-private collaborations that protect democratic processes, guided by these lessons. Government can work cooperatively with tech companies without sacrificing free speech, but it must do with commitments to accountability, transparency, and intimate privacy in mind.

Suggested Citation

Citron, Danielle Keats and Stautberg, Jeffrey, Public-Private Partnerships After Murthy v. Missouri
(July 31, 2024). Indiana Law Journal, forthcoming, Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2024-55, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4911912

Danielle Keats Citron (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Jeffrey Stautberg

University of Virginia (UVA) School of Law ( email )

United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
163
Abstract Views
757
Rank
361,583
PlumX Metrics