Unpacking the politics of Nature-based Solutions governance: Making space for transformative change

33 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2024

See all articles by Caitlin Hafferty

Caitlin Hafferty

University of Oxford

Emmanuel Selasi Tomude

University of Nottingham, UK

Audrey Wagner

University of Oxford

Constance L McDermott

University of Oxford - Environmental Change Institute (ECI)

Mark Hirons

University of Oxford - School of Geography and the Environment

Date Written: August 01, 2024

Abstract

Nature-based Solutions (NbS) have gained global attention for their transformative potential to simultaneously address biodiversity loss, climate change, and human well-being. However, there are concerns that dominant framings reinforce vested interests, marginalise alternative perspectives, and lead to persistent patterns of inequality and injustice. While participatory governance of NbS is widely acclaimed to support more equitable and ‘just’ outcomes, it is unclear to what extent the necessary changes can occur within dominant framings and approaches. To address this gap, this paper foregrounds the messy, contested, and discontinuous politics of sustainability transformations to explore how different framings influence the transformative potential of NbS. Drawing from interviews and a survey with NbS practitioners and policy makers in the UK, we critically unpack the interplay between techno-scientific and market-oriented approaches, risk and uncertainty, and participatory governance processes in shaping transformative NbS. Our findings demonstrate that, despite numerous efforts to (re)frame and (re)think NbS, there is the need to create space for different conceptualisations and practices, creating the necessary space for alternative approaches to transformation. We suggest that this requires breaking free from dominant techno-market framings that demand certainty and control over sustainability outcomes, and caution against “democracy washing” through NbS that perpetuates superficial participation and unequal power relations. These debates indicate that transformational NbS will require an explicit recognition of these power inequalities and a commitment to cultivate and open up - rather than control and close down - alternative perspectives, pathways, and possibilities that foster justice and well-being for both humans and nature.

Keywords: Nature-based Solutions, transformation, politics, participation, framings, United Kingdom

Suggested Citation

Hafferty, Caitlin and Tomude, Emmanuel Selasi and Wagner, Audrey and McDermott, Constance L and Hirons, Mark, Unpacking the politics of Nature-based Solutions governance: Making space for transformative change (August 01, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4912761

Caitlin Hafferty (Contact Author)

University of Oxford ( email )

Mansfield Road
Oxford, OX1 4AU
United Kingdom

Emmanuel Selasi Tomude

University of Nottingham, UK ( email )

Audrey Wagner

University of Oxford ( email )

Constance L McDermott

University of Oxford - Environmental Change Institute (ECI) ( email )

South Parks Road
Oxford, OX1 3QY
United Kingdom

Mark Hirons

University of Oxford - School of Geography and the Environment ( email )

Mansfield Road
Oxford OX1 3TB, OX1 3QY
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
71
Abstract Views
207
Rank
626,628
PlumX Metrics