Platform Entry and Vendor Competition in On-Demand Economy

60 Pages Posted: 26 Aug 2024

See all articles by Arseniy Gorbushin

Arseniy Gorbushin

Rotman School of Management

Ming Hu

University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management

Xiaotang Yang

University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management; University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering

Yun Zhou

McMaster University - Michael G. DeGroote School of Business

Date Written: August 07, 2024

Abstract

We consider an on-demand delivery system with multiple competing vendors and examine the impact of introducing a delivery platform on their competition. Customers have preferences for differentiated vendors while also being sensitive to the overall cost of both the food price and the delivery fee. They place orders from a vendor only if they can be delivered within a specified delivery window. Each vendor strategically decides whether to participate on the platform, build its dedicated delivery fleet (i.e., employing in-house delivery), or not offer any delivery option (i.e., exclusively serving local customers as an outside option) to maximize its profit. Vendors who build their own dedicated delivery fleets decide on both the food price and delivery fee. Vendors who choose to participate on the platform set their food price, while the profit-maximizing platform sets the delivery fee and takes a commission from the vendors' revenue. We solve for the system equilibrium and benchmark it against the system without the platform. Our findings indicate that the introduction of the platform either intensifies vendor competition, leading to lower vendor profits and higher individual customer surplus, or conversely, alleviates vendor competition, leading to higher vendor profits and lower individual customer surplus. The intensifying or alleviating role of the platform on vendor competition hinges on the competitive environment of the market in which the vendors operate. We characterize conditions under which the platform's equilibrium strategy involves subsidizing per-order delivery to encourage vendor participation. However, perhaps surprisingly, the seemingly appealing per-order delivery subsidy (offered by the platform to attract vendor participation) hurts vendors by encouraging them to engage in more intensified competition, ultimately diminishing their profits. Conversely, if the platform derives profits from per-order delivery, introducing the platform alleviates vendor competition and benefits vendors. Therefore, the platform-enabled sharing of couriers can improve delivery efficiency and lower delivery costs but may intensify vendor competition through per-order delivery subsidy, placing them in a prisoner's dilemma that ultimately lowers their profits. These insights also apply to an e-commerce platform that provides storage and fulfillment services with economies of scale enabled by aggregating the business of sellers operating on the platform.

Suggested Citation

Gorbushin, Arseniy and Hu, Ming and Yang, Xiaotang and Zhou, Yun, Platform Entry and Vendor Competition in On-Demand Economy (August 07, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4918484 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4918484

Arseniy Gorbushin

Rotman School of Management ( email )

105 St. George st
Toronto, ON M5S 3E6
Canada

Ming Hu (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management ( email )

105 St. George st
Toronto, ON M5S 3E6
Canada
416-946-5207 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://ming.hu

Xiaotang Yang

University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management ( email )

105 St. George Street
Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6 M5S1S4
Canada

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering ( email )

111 Church St SE
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

Yun Zhou

McMaster University - Michael G. DeGroote School of Business ( email )

1280 Main Street West
Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
59
Abstract Views
164
Rank
684,519
PlumX Metrics