A Monte Carlo Study of Growth Regressions
53 Pages Posted: 27 Jan 2004 Last revised: 24 Oct 2024
There are 2 versions of this paper
A Monte Carlo Study of Growth Regressions
Date Written: January 2004
Abstract
Using Monte Carlo simulations, this paper evaluates the bias properties of common estimators used in growth regressions derived from the Solow model. We explicitly allow for measurement error in the right-hand side variables, as well as country-specific effects that are correlated with the regressors. Our results suggest that using an OLS estimator applied to a single cross-section of variables averaged over time (the between estimator) performs best in terms of the extent of bias on each of the estimated coefficients. The fixed-effects estimator and the Arellano-Bond estimator greatly overstate the speed of convergence under a wide variety of assumptions concerning the type and extent of measurement error, while between understates it somewhat. Finally, fixed effects and Arellano-Bond bias towards zero the slope estimates on the human and physical capital accumulation variables.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models
By William Easterly and Ross Levine
-
Is Growth Exogenous? Taking Mankiw, Romer and Weil Seriously
-
Capital Mobility in Neoclassical Models of Growth
By Robert J. Barro, N. Gregory Mankiw, ...
-
Relative Prices and Relative Prosperity
By Chang-tai Hsieh and Peter J. Klenow
-
The Marginal Product of Capital
By Francesco Caselli and James Feyrer
-
The Marginal Product of Capital
By Francesco Caselli and James Feyrer
-
By Jonathan Eaton and Samuel S. Kortum
-
The Tyranny of Concepts: Cudie (Cumulated, Depreciated Investment Effort) is Not Capital