Counterpoint: Tax Exceptionalism from Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking Procedures Is Bad Policy and Bad Law

ABA TAX TIMES, Winter-Spring • June 2024 • Vol. 43 No. 2

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 24-36

10 Pages Posted: 3 Sep 2024

See all articles by Kristin E. Hickman

Kristin E. Hickman

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law

Date Written: August 16, 2024

Abstract

This solicited counterpoint essay defends a judicial trend of demanding that the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service satisfy the same procedural requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act as other federal agencies when they adopt regulations. The essay responds to an article and an essay by Prof. David Weisbach in which he argues that APA notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures generally add little value in the tax context and that courts should back off and interpret administrative law requirements to allow Treasury and the IRS to be more relaxed than other agencies about how they follow those procedures.

Note: “This is an article published by the American Bar Association Section of Taxation in ABA Tax Times in the Winter-Spring 2024 issue.”

Keywords: tax administration, rulemaking procedures, administrative procedure act, tax exceptionalism

Suggested Citation

Hickman, Kristin E., Counterpoint: Tax Exceptionalism from Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking Procedures Is Bad Policy and Bad Law (August 16, 2024). ABA TAX TIMES, Winter-Spring • June 2024 • Vol. 43 No. 2, Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 24-36, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4928214 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4928214

Kristin E. Hickman (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law ( email )

229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-2915 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
43
Abstract Views
217
PlumX Metrics