Robust Technology Regulation

66 Pages Posted: 19 Sep 2024 Last revised: 17 Mar 2025

See all articles by Andrew Koh

Andrew Koh

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Sivakorn Sanguanmoo

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Date Written: August 20, 2024

Abstract

We analyze how uncertain technologies should be robustly regulated. An agent develops a new technology and, while privately learning about its harms and benefits, chooses whether to continue R&D. A principal chooses among dynamic mechanisms to shape R&D choices in different states. A regulatory sandbox mechanism comprising of a zero marginal tax on R&D up to a hard limit is (i) robust: it delivers optimal payoff guarantees when nature chooses the agent's learning process and preferences adversarially; (ii) dominant: it outperforms other robust mechanisms evaluated at any learning process and agent preference; and (iii) important: absent a hard limit, worst-case payoffs can be arbitrarily poor and is induced by weak but growing optimism generating excessive risk-taking. If regulators also learn, an adaptive sandbox optimally incorporates new information while safeguarding against the worst-case. Our results offer optimality foundations for existing policy as well as guidance for future policy. 

Keywords: Mechanism Design, Information Design, Regulation, Robustness, Learning, AI, Sandbox

Suggested Citation

Koh, Andrew and Sanguanmoo, Sivakorn, Robust Technology Regulation (August 20, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4932709 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4932709

Andrew Koh (Contact Author)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) ( email )

77 Massachusetts Avenue
50 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
United States
8579284892 (Phone)

Sivakorn Sanguanmoo

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
51
Abstract Views
251
Rank
803,881
PlumX Metrics