Anticipating A New Modern Skidmore Standard

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 24-37

Duke Law Journal Online (forthcoming 2025)

17 Pages Posted: 3 Sep 2024

See all articles by Kristin E. Hickman

Kristin E. Hickman

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law

Date Written: August 29, 2024

Abstract

In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court overruled Chevron deference but blessed giving agency interpretations "respect" or "weight" during judicial review under the Skidmore standard. Yet, the Court offered only a brief survey in Loper Bright regarding Skidmore as a doctrine, with little guidance regarding what judicial review under Skidmore ought to look like. The Court might not have felt the need to elaborate, as Skidmore review has been around in one form or another for eighty years. Yet, Skidmore is a more complicated doctrine than many people realize. An extensive Skidmore jurisprudence exists, with nuances that do not entirely square with some of the assumptions and reasoning in Loper Bright. The purpose of this Essay is to explore the world of Skidmore review of agency statutory interpretations and to anticipate some of the questions about Skidmore that will inevitably arise as courts apply it in future cases.

Keywords: Skidmore, Chevron, Loper Bright, judicial review, statutory interpretation

Suggested Citation

Hickman, Kristin E., Anticipating A New Modern Skidmore Standard (August 29, 2024). Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 24-37, Duke Law Journal Online (forthcoming 2025), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4941144 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4941144

Kristin E. Hickman (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law ( email )

229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-2915 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
240
Abstract Views
601
Rank
273,589
PlumX Metrics