Is 24/7 Trading Better?

55 Pages Posted: 23 Sep 2024 Last revised: 19 Nov 2024

See all articles by Patrick Blonien

Patrick Blonien

Carnegie Mellon University - David A. Tepper School of Business

Alexander Ober

Rice University - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business

Date Written: August 31, 2024

Abstract

Are daily market closures still needed? In a model of large traders who manage inventory risk, we show that traders engage in aggressive trading in anticipation of even a short market closure, which coordinates and concentrates liquidity. A market structure with a daily closure improves allocative efficiency relative to a continuously open market, even though traders cannot trade during the closure itself. If traders have heterogeneous information about the asset value, trade is less aggressive on the whole, but closure still retains its substantial welfare benefits. A calibration of our model suggests moving to longer, say 23/7, trading hours would be beneficial, but moving to 24/7 trading would harm welfare.

Suggested Citation

Blonien, Patrick and Ober, Alexander, Is 24/7 Trading Better? (August 31, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4942934 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4942934

Patrick Blonien (Contact Author)

Carnegie Mellon University - David A. Tepper School of Business ( email )

5000 Forbes Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890
United States

Alexander Ober

Rice University - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business ( email )

6100 South Main Street
P.O. Box 1892
Houston, TX 77005-1892
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
156
Abstract Views
773
Rank
383,379
PlumX Metrics