Do Housing Supply Skeptics Learn? Evidence from Economics and Advocacy Treatments
59 Pages Posted: 18 Oct 2024
Date Written: September 12, 2024
Abstract
Recent research finds that most people want lower housing prices but, contrary to expert consensus, do not believe that more supply would lower prices. This study tests the effects of four informational interventions on Americans’ beliefs about housing markets and associated policy preferences and political actions (writing to state lawmakers). Several of the interventions significantly and positively affected economic understanding and support for land-use liberaliza- tion, with standardized effect sizes of 0.15 − 0.3. The most impactful treatment—an educational video from an advocacy group—had effects 2-3 times larger than typical economics-information or political-messaging treatments. Learning about housing markets increased support for development among homeowners as much as renters, contrary to the “homevoter hypothesis.” The treatments did not significantly affect the probability of writing to lawmakers, but an off-plan analysis suggests that the advocacy video increased the number of messages asking for more market-rate housing.
Keywords: housing, land use, public opinion, urban economics, experiment, economic expectations, supply shocks
JEL Classification: R31, D83, D84, D90
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation