The Louisiana Constitution and the Courts of Westminster: Standing and the Civil Law Heritage

NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 24-49

85 Louisiana Law Review (2025, anticipated)

56 Pages Posted: 30 Sep 2024 Last revised: 25 Nov 2024

See all articles by Helen Hershkoff

Helen Hershkoff

New York University School of Law

Adam Littlestone-Luria

New York University School of Law

Date Written: September 25, 2024

Abstract

A substantial majority of the Roberts Court now purports to rest constitutional jurisprudence on a legal “history and tradition” divined from the nation’s common law heritage. Leaving aside the question whether this approach should carry dispositive weight in interpreting the federal Constitution, this Article raises a different but unacknowledged concern:  The Court’s brand of originalism relies on a cramped notion of the nation’s “usable past.” Its myopic focus on our common law heritage erases other critical threads in the relevant legal legacy. In particular, the Article focuses on the civil law heritage of the Louisiana Constitution. As a first step, we interrogate whether the Louisiana court should automatically interpret its state standing requirement in lock step with the federal. We argue that the Supreme Court’s recent move to limit the kinds of legal harms that count as a basis for Article III standing in terms of common law analogues may cause serious distortion if it is mimicked by Louisiana’s courts. Since the civil tradition and civil codes play such an integral role as the source and definition of private rights and interests, a singular focus on common law analogs may warp the proper “history and tradition” that is relevant to Louisiana law. In conclusion, the article steps beyond the Louisiana context, arguing that the analysis carries wider implications.  Assuming that history and tradition must, or at least may, play a role in legal analysis, lawmakers and judges in each state should recognize the potential inherent in their own distinctive legal legacies. As a final step, we argue that the Supreme Court’s brand of originalism obscures the deep pluralism that marks the nation’s history and tradition—a multiplicity which standing doctrine should respect and even celebrate.

Suggested Citation

Hershkoff, Helen and Littlestone-Luria, Adam, The Louisiana Constitution and the Courts of Westminster: Standing and the Civil Law Heritage (September 25, 2024). NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 24-49, 85 Louisiana Law Review (2025, anticipated), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4971758 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4971758

Helen Hershkoff (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

HOME PAGE: http://rb.gy/ca21v3

Adam Littlestone-Luria

New York University School of Law ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
148
Abstract Views
480
Rank
407,534
PlumX Metrics