lancet-header

Preprints with The Lancet is a collaboration between The Lancet Group of journals and SSRN to facilitate the open sharing of preprints for early engagement, community comment, and collaboration. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early-stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision-making or presented without highlighting these facts. For more information, please see the FAQs.

Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

20 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2024

See all articles by Zhishan Zhang

Zhishan Zhang

Fujian Medical University - Quanzhou First Hospital

Junxing Xie

Fujian Medical University - Quanzhou First Hospital

Jing Wang

Fujian Medical University - Quanzhou First Hospital

Hong Zhao

Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU) - Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center

Bin Zhao

Fujian Medical University - Quanzhou First Hospital

More...

Abstract

Background: The application of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-based neoadjuvant therapy has been approved in breast cancer since 2021. However, no meta-analyses have systemly evaluated its efficacy and safety in randomized and non-randomized settings. Additionally, there exists controversy about which specific population can benefit from this strategy.


Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched from inception to September 2024 was conducted for all prospective clinical trials of ICB-based neoadjuvant therapy in patients with breast cancer without language restriction. Pathological and survival outcomes and adverse events were pooled to estimate the efficacy and safety.

Findings: Here, among 22 eligible trials with 6134 women, there were 11 randomized studies with 5574 patients. Pooled pathological complete response (relative risk [RR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.20-1.58), event-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.81), and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.354-0.91) favored ICB-based neoadjuvant therapy over conventional treatment. Moreover, the benefits of event-free survival were independent of PD-L1 expression (Pinteraction=0.57) and previous pathological complete response (Pinteraction=0.37). Combining ICB with conventional neoadjuvant treatment significantly increased the risk of high-grade treatment-related adverse event (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12), treatment-related serious adverse event (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.26-1.94), treatment discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse event (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.14-1.90), and potentially fatal adverse event (RR, 2.25; 95% CI, 0.80-6.31). 

Interpretation: The addition of ICB to conventional neoadjuvant treatment is associated with favorable clinical outcomes and importantly, greatly increases severe toxicities. Clinicians should meticulously monitor patients for adverse events to minimize the risk of treatment discontinuation in individuals with potentially curable breast cancer. Future research needs to better define patient stratification and optimize treatment approaches that could derive benefit from ICB-based neoadjuvant therapy while minimizing the risk of severe toxicity.

Funding: This work was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82373367).

Declaration of Interest: We declare no competing interests.

Keywords: neoadjuvant therapy, immune checkpoint blockade, Breast cancer, Toxicity, pathologic complete response, event free survival

Suggested Citation

Zhang, Zhishan and Xie, Junxing and Wang, Jing and Zhao, Hong and Zhao, Bin, Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4978382 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4978382

Zhishan Zhang

Fujian Medical University - Quanzhou First Hospital ( email )

Junxing Xie

Fujian Medical University - Quanzhou First Hospital ( email )

Jing Wang

Fujian Medical University - Quanzhou First Hospital ( email )

Hong Zhao

Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU) - Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center ( email )

Bin Zhao (Contact Author)

Fujian Medical University - Quanzhou First Hospital ( email )