Inferring a 'Dispute' from State Silence

Leiden Journal of International Law, forthcoming March 2025

Faculty of Laws University College London Law Research Paper No. 25/2024

59 Pages Posted: 14 Oct 2024 Last revised: 15 Oct 2024

See all articles by Danae Azaria

Danae Azaria

University College London - Faculty of Laws

Date Written: March 02, 2024

Abstract

A dispute’s existence is a requirement for establishing the jurisdiction of numerous international courts and tribunals. It requires that a State opposes the claim of another State. Yet, when a State is silent in response to a claim directed at it, there is ambiguity about the silent State’s view. This article argues that opposition and a dispute can be inferred from State silence under specific cumulative conditions: when a claim has been made in circumstances that call for the silent State’s reaction; when the silent State is aware of the claim; and when reasonable time of silence passed. Because it prevents tactical silences from undermining international justice, the inference must be encouraged. The conditions, under which the inference can be made, should also be retained in international adjudication, because they perform primarily an evidentiary function, as well as a cautionary and a channelling function.

Keywords: dispute, jurisdiction, international courts and tribunals, State silence, international adjudication

Suggested Citation

Azaria, Danae, Inferring a 'Dispute' from State Silence (March 02, 2024). Leiden Journal of International Law, forthcoming March 2025, Faculty of Laws University College London Law Research Paper No. 25/2024, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4981442 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4981442

Danae Azaria (Contact Author)

University College London - Faculty of Laws ( email )

Bentham House
4-8 Endsleigh Gardens
London, WC1E OEG
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
40
Abstract Views
212
PlumX Metrics