Does the Irish Constitution Forbid a Vocal Presidency?

Dublin University Law Journal, Forthcoming

17 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2024 Last revised: 6 Jan 2025

See all articles by Seán Rainford

Seán Rainford

Dublin City University, School of Law and Government

Jamie McLoughlin

University College Dublin (UCD)

Date Written: October 10, 2024

Abstract

Constitutional and political orthodoxy holds that the President of Ireland should be ‘above politics’ and must refrain from engaging in commentary that is partisan or against Government policy. We call this the constitutional ‘convention of silence’. Using the Jennings test for conventions, we argue that this convention is not mandated by the Irish Constitution and that political commentary by the President is constitutionally permissible. First, ‘precedent’ and ‘belief’ in the convention among relevant actors are no longer present. Second, the stated ‘reason’ for the convention – ensuring constitutional harmony – is undermined by the fact that the President and Government are constitutionally distinct. Third, it is further undermined by the President’s direct election, which gives the officeholder legitimacy in speaking on matters about which there is political disagreement. We conclude by offering potential advantages that a more openly political Presidency may bring to the Irish constitutional system.

Keywords: Irish Constitution, Irish President, Constitutional law

Suggested Citation

Rainford, Seán and McLoughlin, Jamie, Does the Irish Constitution Forbid a Vocal Presidency?
(October 10, 2024). Dublin University Law Journal, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4982252 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4982252

Seán Rainford (Contact Author)

Dublin City University, School of Law and Government ( email )

Ireland

Jamie McLoughlin

University College Dublin (UCD) ( email )

Belfield
Dublin
Ireland

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
217
Abstract Views
531
Rank
299,382
PlumX Metrics