Quantitative Fire Risk Assessment of Battery Home Storage Systems in Comparison to General House Fires in Germany and Other Battery Related Fires

14 Pages Posted: 22 Oct 2024

See all articles by Florian Hölting

Florian Hölting

RWTH Aachen University

Aniket Kapse

RWTH Aachen University

Fabian Breer

ISEA RWTH Aachen

Jan Figgener

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Mark Junker

RWTH Aachen University

Dirk Uwe Sauer

RWTH Aachen University

Abstract

Battery storage systems are becoming an integral part of the energy transition, as they offer the possibility of bridging time windows in which self-generated renewable energy is not available and they are able to deliver manifold system services to the grid. The most battery storage systems are today found in home storage systems (HSS) and electric vehicles (EV), and their growth continues exponentially. Despite this upside development, there are public concerns about potential fire risks associated with PV home storage systems as well as EV.In this scientific paper, we conduct a quantitative analysis to compare statistics of fires occurring in HSS with fires in photovoltaic (PV) systems, in EV, internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and general house fires. The fires in HSS in Germany were determined using web crawling for the year 2023 because no other data was available. All other probabilities were calculated using researched data. The results show a significantly lower probability of an HSS fire compared to a general house fire. In detail, the findings indicate that the probability of an HSS fire is very low (0.0049 %) and is 50 times lower than for a general house fire. All modern home appliances have a generally low probability of catching fire, this is also true for HSS. If compared to other home appliances, HSS share roughly the same probability of catching fire as tumblers. Compared to the generally low fire probability of an HSS, the probability of PV systems catching fire is a further three times lower. The probability of a traditional ICE vehicle fire (0.089 %) is approximately four times higher than that of an EV fire. The probability of an HSS catching fire is approximately 18 times lower than an ICE catching fire and four times lower vs. an EV.These results provide important insights into the risks and safety aspects of battery storage in the domestic environment and help to make informed decisions about the integration of renewable energy systems.

Keywords: home storage systems, fire probability, domestic fires, vehicle fires, battery storage, fire safety measures

Suggested Citation

Hölting, Florian and Kapse, Aniket and Breer, Fabian and Figgener, Jan and Junker, Mark and Sauer, Dirk Uwe, Quantitative Fire Risk Assessment of Battery Home Storage Systems in Comparison to General House Fires in Germany and Other Battery Related Fires. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4995517 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4995517

Florian Hölting (Contact Author)

RWTH Aachen University ( email )

Templergraben 55
52056 Aachen, 52056
Germany

Aniket Kapse

RWTH Aachen University ( email )

Templergraben 55
52056 Aachen, 52056
Germany

Fabian Breer

ISEA RWTH Aachen ( email )

Jan Figgener

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Mark Junker

RWTH Aachen University ( email )

Templergraben 55
52056 Aachen, 52056
Germany

Dirk Uwe Sauer

RWTH Aachen University ( email )

Templergraben 55
52056 Aachen, 52056
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
2,190
Abstract Views
40,177
Rank
14,465
PlumX Metrics