More True Confessions of a Legal Writing Professor: Is the Phrase "And/Or" Really So Evil? 

9 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2024

See all articles by Diana Simon

Diana Simon

James E. Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona

Date Written: October 31, 2024

Abstract

This, at times, irreverent, tongue-in-cheek article is about the phrase, “and/or” and the reasons why it is ambiguous. First, this article discusses how legal writing experts, courts, and other commentators have criticized the phrase in terms that are not so complimentary. Second, it discusses how notwithstanding this criticism, courts, including the Supreme Court, have used it. Third, it discusses those instances when it might be appropriate to use the phrase using case law examples involving the adequacy of allegations in a complaint and in statutes (although people are divided on whether this is appropriate). Fourth, it addresses those situations where the phrase should not be used, such as in indictments and jury instructions. Finally, it addresses the use of the phrase in contracts.  

Keywords: and/or in contracts, statutes, indictments, jury instructions, contracts, statutes, legal writing, ambiguity

Suggested Citation

Simon, Diana, More True Confessions of a Legal Writing Professor: Is the Phrase "And/Or" Really So Evil?  (October 31, 2024). Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 24-29, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5007025 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5007025

Diana Simon (Contact Author)

James E. Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona ( email )

P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
49
Abstract Views
301
PlumX Metrics