Robustness of Productivity Estimates
55 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2004 Last revised: 28 Aug 2022
Date Written: February 2004
Abstract
Researchers interested in estimating productivity can choose from an array of methodologies, each with its strengths and weaknesses. Many methodologies are not very robust to measurement error in inputs. This is particularly troublesome, because fundamentally the objective of productivity measurement is to identify output differences that cannot be explained by input differences. Two other sources of error are misspecifications in the deterministic portion of the production technology and erroneous assumptions on the evolution of unobserved productivity. Techniques to control for the endogeneity of productivity in the firm's input choice decision risk exacerbating these problems. I compare the robustness of five widely used techniques: (a) index numbers, (b) data envelopment analysis, and three parametric methods: (c) instrumental variables estimation, (d) stochastic frontiers, and (e) semiparametric estimation. The sensitivity of each method to a variety of measurement and specification errors is evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Exporting Raises Productivity in Sub-Saharan African Manufacturing Plants
-
Heterogeneity in Panel Data: are There Stable Production Functions?
By Jacques Mairesse and Zvi Griliches
-
Learning to Export: Evidence from Moroccan Manufacturing
By Marcel Fafchamps, Albert Zeufack, ...
-
The Diffusion of Technology and Inequality Among Nations
By Boyan Jovanovic and Saul Lach
-
Electricity Pricing to U.S. Manufacturing Plants, 1963-2000
By Steven J. Davis, Cheryl Grim, ...
-
Electricity Pricing to U.S. Manufacturing Plants, 1963-2000
By Steven J. Davis, Cheryl Grim, ...
-
Up in Smoke: the Influence of Household Behavior on the Long-Run Impact of Improved Cooking Stoves
By Rema Hanna, Esther Duflo, ...