Comparative Analysis of Rural Organic Waste Treatment Scenarios: Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Environmental Impacts, and Economic Performance

55 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2024

See all articles by Hao Peng

Hao Peng

Tianjin University

Lan Mu

Tianjin University of Commerce

Yingjin Song

Tianjin University

Dan Zeng

Tibet University

Hong Su

Tianjin University of Commerce

Zhanjun Cheng

Tianjin University - School of Environmental Science and Engineering

Rundong Li

Shenyang Aerospace University

Guanyi Chen

Tianjin University

Abstract

The management of rural organic solid wastes (ROSW) in China have faced significant environmental and economic challenges. There is an urgent need to explore more optimal scenarios for ROSW management. This study compared and evaluated three ROSW treatment scenarios (anaerobic digestion (AD), aerobic composting (AC), the integration of anaerobic digestion combined with aerobic composting (AD-AC). Emission factor methods, life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis were applied to assess greenhouse emissions, other environmental impacts and the economic performance for each scenario. The results indicated that AD-AC scenario provided the lowest net GHGs emissions (1462.38 kg CO2-eq/FU), compare to AD scenario (3008.06 kg CO2-eq/FU) and AC scenario (2394.78 kg CO2-eq/FU). Additionally, AD-AC scenario achieved the most substantial environmental advantages in Human health and Ecosystem of End-points impact categories and Terrestrial ecotoxicity, Fossil resource scarcity, Human carcinogenic toxicity, Land use, Ozone formation, Water consumption and Mineral resource scarcity of Mid-point impact categories. Also, AD-AC scenario demonstrated considerable economic benefits (1765.7 CNY/FU). These findings revealed that AD-AC were more low-carbon and sustainable than the AD-only or AC-only scenario. This study provided valuable insights for the implementation of integrated waste management systems and contributes to advancing the sustainability of rural waste management in China.

Keywords: Rural organic solid wastes, Anaerobic digestion, Aerobic composting, Greenhouse gas emissions, economic performance

Suggested Citation

Peng, Hao and Mu, Lan and Song, Yingjin and Zeng, Dan and Su, Hong and Cheng, Zhanjun and Li, Rundong and Chen, Guanyi, Comparative Analysis of Rural Organic Waste Treatment Scenarios: Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Environmental Impacts, and Economic Performance. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5029901 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5029901

Hao Peng

Tianjin University ( email )

92, Weijin Road
Nankai District
Tianjin, 300072
China

Lan Mu (Contact Author)

Tianjin University of Commerce ( email )

P.O. box 9007
Tianjin 300072
United States

Yingjin Song

Tianjin University ( email )

92, Weijin Road
Nankai District
Tianjin, 300072
China

Dan Zeng

Tibet University ( email )

China

Hong Su

Tianjin University of Commerce ( email )

P.O. box 9007
Tianjin 300072
United States

Zhanjun Cheng

Tianjin University - School of Environmental Science and Engineering ( email )

Tianjin
China

Rundong Li

Shenyang Aerospace University ( email )

37 Daoyi S St
Shenyang
China

Guanyi Chen

Tianjin University ( email )

92, Weijin Road
Nankai District
Tianjin, Tianjin 300072
China

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
10
Abstract Views
128
PlumX Metrics