"RIGHT IN THEORY, WRONG IN PRACTICE": WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE AND THE RECONSTRUCTION AMENDMENTS"

58 Pages Posted:

See all articles by Gerard N. Magliocca

Gerard N. Magliocca

Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

Date Written: November 27, 2024

Abstract

This Essay explores the most remarkable constitutional argument ever forgotten. In 1871, Representative William Loughridge of Iowa dissented from a report by the House Judiciary Committee. The Judiciary Committee rejected a petition by Victoria Woodhull claiming that the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments gave women the right to vote. Representative Loughridge replied with a defense of women’s suffrage that was the first official declaration of constitutional sex equality. The Woodhull Petition and the Loughridge Dissent are a treasure trove that should be added to the constitutional canon.




 

Suggested Citation

Magliocca, Gerard N., "RIGHT IN THEORY, WRONG IN PRACTICE": WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE AND THE RECONSTRUCTION AMENDMENTS" (November 27, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=

Gerard N. Magliocca (Contact Author)

Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )

530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States
317-278-4792 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
61
Abstract Views
119
PlumX Metrics