"RIGHT IN THEORY, WRONG IN PRACTICE": WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE AND THE RECONSTRUCTION AMENDMENTS"
58 Pages Posted:
Date Written: November 27, 2024
Abstract
This Essay explores the most remarkable constitutional argument ever forgotten. In 1871, Representative William Loughridge of Iowa dissented from a report by the House Judiciary Committee. The Judiciary Committee rejected a petition by Victoria Woodhull claiming that the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments gave women the right to vote. Representative Loughridge replied with a defense of women’s suffrage that was the first official declaration of constitutional sex equality. The Woodhull Petition and the Loughridge Dissent are a treasure trove that should be added to the constitutional canon.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Magliocca, Gerard N., "RIGHT IN THEORY, WRONG IN PRACTICE": WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE AND THE RECONSTRUCTION AMENDMENTS" (November 27, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.